07.04.08

…”our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.”

Posted in Faith, Freedom, Politics at 11:23 am by

… “our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.” how strange those words sound to modern ears, words which are in little use and poorly comprehended by our current “civilization” in which anything goes, just so long as “number one” is taken care of.  And yet, that is what the signers of the Declaration of Independence pledged to each other.  They knew that they were in grave danger from the king and his minions - and yet they put their names down and thus passed into the pages of history, founding the greatest bastion of freedom the world has yet known.

A careful reading of the document shows that the very abuses laid out by the signers of the declaration are things which today’s people do not understand.  Too many have sold their freedom for “security” and when one cries “but the emperor has no clothes!” they act as though one were crazy - and blind.

232 years have passed since that fateful signing - it is time for our nation to read once more those words and to reflect upon them.  Do we still believe in these values?

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

— John Hancock

New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett, William Whipple, Matthew Thornton

Massachusetts:
John Hancock, Samuel Adams, John Adams, Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge Gerry

Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins, William Ellery

Connecticut:
Roger Sherman, Samuel Huntington, William Williams, Oliver Wolcott

New York:
William Floyd, Philip Livingston, Francis Lewis, Lewis Morris

New Jersey:
Richard Stockton, John Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, John Hart, Abraham Clark

Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush, Benjamin Franklin, John Morton, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, James Wilson, George Ross

Delaware:
Caesar Rodney, George Read, Thomas McKean

Maryland:
Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, Charles Carroll of Carrollton

Virginia:
George Wythe, Richard Henry Lee, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Harrison, Thomas Nelson, Jr., Francis Lightfoot Lee, Carter Braxton

North Carolina:
William Hooper, Joseph Hewes, John Penn

South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge, Thomas Heyward, Jr., Thomas Lynch, Jr., Arthur Middleton

Georgia:
Button Gwinnett, Lyman Hall, George Walton

07.02.08

As Independence Day Draws Near

Posted in Freedom, Politics at 11:40 am by

In just a couple days we’ll be celebrating the fact that 232 years ago a band of brave men pledged their “lives, fortunes and their sacred honor” to declaring the 13 north American British colonies to be independent from England.  They said “No!” to the stamp act, “No!” to the Tea Act,  “No!” to the quartering act, etc.  They didn’t “choose the lesser of two evils” - they said “Give me liberty, or give me death!” and then picked up their muskets and marched into battle.

Now, 232 years later, we’re being told “It doesn’t matter that John McCain was one of the Keating Five, nor does it matter that his name is part of the McCain-Feingold or the McCain-Kennedy pieces of foul legislation, it matters only that he’s the Republican candidate and we’ve got to get behind him or lose to the Democrats.”  Uh, I beg your pardon, but since WHEN does putting a Republican into office constitute voting for freedom?  Under our latest Republican President we got “The Patriot Act” and “Department of Homeland Security” and the joy of removing our shoes in the airport and being scrutinized and humiliated by government minions when we wish to travel by air.  Yes, it’s all about “the war on terror” and “we’ve not been hit again since 2001″ but we HAVE paid - with our freedoms.  Once more our freedom is taken away “to make us safe” - thus giving victory to those who would destroy our freedom via terrorism, we’ve given them victory by surrendering our nation’s freedom in the name of “safety” - while refusing to act against those who are REAL threats as we allow non-threats to be harassed in the name of “security”.

Also, once more we are being rallied to the support of the GOP - the very group that is sponsoring the AWB Version 2 (Assault Weapons Ban) - that’s right, the very ones who are saying “you’ve GOT to get behind McCain” are the ones who are pushing for a new (and worsened) version of the failed Clinton Assault Weapons Ban.  I feel like I’m living in some “Wonderland” such as Alice fell into.  Or, worse yet, like “1984″ is coming to life twenty four years later.  We now have “double speak” as the national language, apparently.  “Conservative” now means new bans on freedom and new assaults on our resources.  The only (slight) comfort one can get is that “Liberal” is MUCH worse, sliding into the deepest recesses of Marxist/Leninist doctrine - but the so-called “Conservatives” are little better any more.

And there’s a growing rallying cry of “No MORE!” when it comes to those who would pull the wool over our eyes once more.  It will be interesting to see what transpires in November.  Interesting in the same way that seeing an out of control cruise ship come steaming into a crowded harbor and crashing through the pier is “interesting” - a sense of horror and impotence sets in as one realizes that there’s nothing one can do as the captain obliviously allows the ship to steam to its destruction - this is the feeling I get as I see the GOP once more steaming powerfully forward - in the wrong direction.

And many will say “Vote for McCain or you’re voting for Obama.” No, no matter how I vote I vote my conscience.  And if I vote for a third party it will NOT be for Obama - it will be for the candidate for whom I’m voting.  The guilt trip should be laid upon those who are responsible for drumming up support for such a leftist candidate as John McCain is.  There are good men yet in the nation, I’m sure of it.  So why are we supposed to be getting behind someone who has proven time after time that he leans farther left than many Democrats (some southern Democrats are more conservative in their values and voting than their Republican couterparts)?  Just because of a party name?  What’s in a name? A marxist by any other name smells just as bad to a freedom loving person.

Two hundred and thirty two years after the signing of the Declaration of Independence - and what have we done to our country?  Will we allow her to slide ever deeper into the socialist mire that is sucking her freedom dry?  Well, time will tell.  Many of us will NOT vote for those who drag us in that direction.  And we will NOT be to blame for the sinking of the ship.  Those who ignore our calls of “Wrong direction, wrong director!” and insist on following the pied piper of ever increasing socialization of the nation are the ones to blame.  Give us a candidate who sings the old song of freedom and liberty and you’ll see supporters crawling from the woodwork all around.  But don’t expect those who think for themselves and who refuse to get on board a ship bound for destruction just because “at least it’ll crash later than the other choice” to rally around a RINO who has proven himself to be an enemy of our nations ancient values.  To paraphrase what the man said, “Being shot down and spending years as a POW does not necessarily qualify a person to be President of the United States.”

06.23.08

If the first were treated like the second…

Posted in Christian, Faith, Firearms, Freedom at 3:51 pm by

Have you ever imagined what the world would be like if the First Amendment to the US Constitution were treated like the Second Amendment has been?  After all, EVERYONE’S in favor of “reasonable restrictions” on the exercise of the Second Amendment and EVERYONE’S in favor of “proper training” for those who choose to exercise their right.  So, what if we demanded that the First (and all the rest) were treated equally?

You’d have to get a permit from your local government in order to post a blog.  You’d be limited to the number of blogs you could have.  You’d be limited in the number of words you could print on a given topic.  You’d not be allowed to use any of that “saturday night special” language - nor any of that “sophisticated military style language”.   The right to worship God as you see fit would be regulated and perhaps limited to “one religious service a month”.  You’d have to have a license from the government to use religious language.  You’d be at the mercy of the BPSRO (Bureau of Political Speech and Religious Organizations) and any regulations they’d dream up to further hamper your freedom.  Anyone who wished to collect or sell Bibles and other religious or political books would have to jump through hoops to acquire the Federal, State and Local permits to do so - and would be subject to surprise visits to check that their paperwork was in order and all such dangerous items were properly stored and accounted for.

And the list could go on and on… how long would folks stand for it?  I fear that the time may not be to far distant when such types of authoritarian infringements might become reality.  Already many laws are in place which say that quoting the Bible is “hate speech” and one can actually be punished quite severely for doing so.  “Radicals” who dare question the furtherance of the “homosexual agenda” to not only “normalize” but actually promote as desirable the sodomite lifestyle are already coming under fire -as are those who question the advisability of promoting obviously flawed “sex education” classes in public schools or who oppose the murdering of pre-born infants.  The infringements have started - it’s probably only a matter of time before the First Amendment will be as heavily fettered as the Second.

06.04.08

An Anniversary Bash

Posted in Christian, Faith, Freedom, Friends, Religion at 6:28 pm by

We started holding public meetings in Pereira on the first Sunday of June in 2002.  That first Sunday we had our family (six of us at the time) and one other family - of three at that time.  Since then the Lord has blessed us and many have joined us in worshiping and studying God’s word.  Many of those have moved on to other cities and other congregations, but the Lord has preserved a remnant here and in the past year has blessed and increased the number of His people here.  Lately we’ve been stretching the folks a bit, encouraging them to move past their “comfort zone” to seek what the Lord is wanting to do through their life.  But I digress.  On June 1st, 2008 we had our annual “Anniversary Bash” This year we held it here at the house and were joined by 39 people, including two new families.  For some of them it was the first time they experienced a “party” in which they didn’t have to drink to have “fun”.  What a novelty to wake up the next day and remember what all happened and to not have a hangover… :)

04.19.08

233 Years Ago Today

Posted in Christian, Faith, Firearms, Freedom, Politics, Religion at 6:12 pm by

233 years ago today a group of simple village and farm folk stood up against the forces of an empire which desired to force upon them its ideals and laws. They “fired the shot heard ’round the world” and after several long years of war they attained their goal - a free and sovereign nation that was built upon Biblical principles with freedom for all. May we all be grateful for the legacy passed down to us by those brave men. It is because of their resolve and dedication and sacrifice that we enjoy the freedom that we have a US citizens.

Now we have candidates to the presidency of the US who would take away the very freedom by which our nation was founded. We have a candidate who denigrates “fly over land” as “bitter people clinging to their guns and religion”. I stand amazed at the current crop of candidates and can only wonder what happened to the spirit of the men who stood that April morning against the forces of a far off king and set the stage for a grand new nation’s entrance upon the stage of the world. Oh that their spirit may spring once more to life in the hearts of my fellow citizens.

Concord Hymn
by Ralph Waldo Emerson

By the rude bridge that arched the flood,
Their flag to April’s breeze unfurled;
Here once the embattled farmers stood;
And fired the shot heard round the world.

The foe long since in silence slept;
Alike the conqueror silent sleeps,
And Time the ruined bridge has swept
Down the dark stream that seaward creeps.

On this green bank, by this soft stream,
We set to-day a votive stone,
That memory may their deeds redeem,
When, like our sires, our sons are gone.

O Thou who made those heroes dare
To die, and leave their children free, –
Bid Time and Nature gently spare
The shaft we raised to them and Thee.

04.07.08

Thoughts on “cop bashing”

Posted in Freedom, Miscellaneous at 9:03 am by

Lately I’ve noticed a tendency on certain internet communities to bash all law enforcement officers for the actions of some. This is a worrisome trend and although I understand WHY folks distrust people in uniform it is something that needs to be addressed. It does not behoove a fair man to use of a broad brush in characterizing any group of people. Yes, there is a disturbing trend in our law enforcement circles to take upon themselves powers not granted to them by the US Constitution. And yes there is a disturbing trend towards militarization of our police forces. And yes there is a disturbing trend towards an “Us vs Them” attitude amongst those who are charged with enforcing our society’s laws. However, there are also many good men who wear the uniform and who put their lives on the line daily in an attempt to reign in the criminal element that lives amongst us.

Over the years I’ve seen abuses committed by people in other walks of life as well. The priest, preacher or other religious figure who abuses his position for personal gain or sexual gratification is beneath contempt. The teacher or professor who hands out good grades in exchange for sexual favors is likewise the scum of the earth. And yet we realize that these are the exceptions to the rule. In the same way, the person who utilizes a firearm to commit a crime is despicable - but in no way is he representative of the majority of the gun owning public.

Just as in any profession, the bad apple gets the press. Those who use a badge to bully and intimidate are the ones who get all the attention. What about those who are doing their best to do the right thing?

The old adage of “walk a mile in their shoes” is one that we should take into consideration. When the cop pulls over a vehicle he doesn’t know if he’s going to find a parish priest late to mass, a soccer mom talking on a phone or a serial killer with a gun in hand and a corpse in the trunk - or just John Q. Public with a chip on his shoulder and disdain for the man behind the badge. The cop, by the very nature of his job, gets to focus in on the seamier side of life. His job is to deal with those who break the law. And since that is what he sees the most, he may very well begin to believe that ALL people are that way. This does not excuse him, but it does help one to understand WHY he has become what he has become.

Some of my friends are either currently serving in law enforcement or have been in law enforcement. To a man they are honest citizens who’s only concern is to do a good job and get home at night to the wife and kids - alive. I believe they are representative of the majority of law enforcement. And my friends are NOT the ones who will kick down doors to enforce anti-constitutional laws and mandates. However, they are also members of smaller town and city departments where folks still have the basic values upon which our nation was founded.

We are at a critical time in our nation’s history. For too long we have sought to improve our society via human philosophies rather than solid Godly principles. And we are reaping the results thereof. We’ve taught folks that there is no personal responsibility and then wonder why our corts are clogged with “not my fault” suits. We have taught that criminals have more rights than tax paying citizens and then wonder why our streets run red with blood. We turn repeat violent offenders out on the streets and punish the law abiding for the crimes the perps commit.

In other words, the perceived problems in law enforcement circles are mere symptoms of the greater ills suffered throughout our entire society. Rather than bashing all police officers for the actions of the over zealous and overbearing jack booted thugs that some are, why not seek positive steps to turn our nation back to a better time? We need good men to step up and fill the ranks of our legislative, executive and judicial branches of government on all levels. We need good men to step forward and fill the ranks of law enforcement and military positions. We need good men to step forward and fill the ranks of our educational establishments. The problem is that there are fewer and fewer good men because too many have taken the position that there’s no such thing as good and bad.

The problem is that we bash law enforcement for the ills that our entire society are guilty of. Instead of scapegoating all cops for the actions of those who abuse their position, why don’t we take responsibility for the changes that we as individuals can make in society - and make a difference by our example?

02.16.08

It ain’t supposed to happen!

Posted in Firearms, Freedom at 8:45 am by

Once more it happened.  The “authorities” had taken all the “proper” measures.  Put in place all the “proper” laws, rules, regulations and controls.  And then - well someone didn’t toe the line that they had drawn.  It happens all the time, every day in fact - somewhere or several somewheres in the world.  And yet one can predict the typical reaction of the sheeple - another call for more rules and regulations to control inanimate objects.

Northern Illinois.  West of Chicago.  One of the areas of the country in which the God given right to self defense has been limited by ignorant or malevolent (take your pick) authorities.  And the results are predictable - some person in search of “revenge” or their “fifteen minutes” (hours? days? whatever the media will give them now) of fame takes an inanimate object and utilizes it to inflict death and destruction on unarmed people.  And again, just as predictably, folks start blaming the object instead of the person who used it for harm.

Why are these things happening in precisely the places where folks think they should be “safe”?  And their logic tells them that they are safe there, after all, don’t they have the rule of law to protect them?  But as the founding fathers pointed out, a republic is only fit to govern a people that is morally, mentally and spiritually fit for freedom.  It will not work for a people that have given up their moral, mental and spiritual obligations - which our current society has done for the most part.  Where do you find a citizen who is willing to “call a spade a spade” when it comes to what is right or wrong?  If one stands up to denounce homosexuality, abortion, sexual promiscuity or any other “sacred cow” then one is shouted down by the mantra of “we must be tolerant” - and so our society has become “tolerant” and given up their moral compass in exchange for the fluctuating, inconsistent and uncertain guidance of “anything goes”.  Where do you find a person who takes time to think things through anymore?  People want answers NOW - if at all.  An excellent example is in the area of mathematical instruction.  Kids are not being taught the very basic mathematical principles.  They can rarely do any functions in their heads - it all has to be filtered through a calculator.  And rather than knowing what is going on in the world around them, folks are mesmerized by the latest “American Idol” or other such “reality” show that has no bearing on real life.   And when it comes to a right relationship with God - well folks either delegate that to the church or deny He exists at all.

When it comes to “ensuring safety”, there is no longer a consensus that safety is an individual concern.  No one remembers the wise words spoken long ago: “He who gives up freedom in exchange for safety, deserves neither freedom nor safety.”  One must be responsible in order to enjoy the fruits of freedom and ensure safety for oneself and one’s family.  But our society teaches us that we are NOT responsible - unless taken to a court of law and forced to pay for another’s stupidity because THEY can’t be held responsible for their own stupidity (reference the McDonalds coffee case).

So “It ain’t supposed to happen!” but it will, time and again, until our society wakes up and realizes that inanimate objects are NOT the problem.  The problem is that individuals utilize them incorrectly and other individuals are denied the means to defend themselves and others from them.  It’s about people, people who have strayed FAR away from their Creator and who choose to violate His principles of conduct.

02.04.08

The lesser of two evils…

Posted in Christian, Faith, Firearms, Freedom, Politics, Religion at 8:19 am by

With 2008 being a presidential election year, we are now about past the middle of the active electioneering that’s been going on since last year.  There’s a recurring theme I keep hearing from dyed in the wool members of the supposed “conservative” party and that is “Anyone but a  Democrat!”  It matters not what the so called “Republican” stands for, all they need to do is say “I’m a REPUBLICAN!” and folks will vote for them.  But that’s not what bothers me the most, and is only partially the reason for this post.

What really “gets my goat” is the attitude that “We have to vote for the ‘lesser of two evils’.”   The lesser of two evils - is still evil.  Let’s see.  On one side we have Democrats who are in favor of the sodomite agenda to demean and dishonor marriage by twisting it to include their unholy unions.  And they are also in favor of executing unborn children who have done no harm to anyone.  And they are in favor of prohibiting the free use of weapons by ordinary, upright citizens.  And they are in favor of granting amnesty to the millions of foreign nationals who have violated our laws and invaded our land. On the other hand we have Republican candidates who are in favor of the sodomite agenda to demean and dishonor marriage by twisting it to include their unholy unions.  And they are also in favor of executing unborn children who have done no harm to anyone.  And they are in favor of prohibiting the free use of weapons by ordinary, upright citizens.  And they are in favor of granting amnesty to the millions of foreign nationals who have violated our laws and invaded our land.  So, what’s to choose from?  Does it really matter which party drags the country into the mud?

Now, I know I’m generalizing and not all the candidates openly support the issues outlined above - but they ALL have  abominable track records on one or more of the issues above, issues I’m convinced are of vital importance to the nation.  And yet, when one says “Send me a truly conservative candidate who will obey and enforce the US Constitution, uphold moral values, secure our borders and decrease the interference of the Federal government in individual citizens’ lives” people tell me “If you DON’T vote Republican you’ll be putting a DEMOCRAT in the oval office!”

I’ve got news for the Republican party.  If they want to REALLY do something POSITIVE and garner the support of the sector of the US population that holds onto traditional values -THEN QUIT TREATING US LIKE IDIOTS BY OFFERING UP LIBERALS IN CONSERVATIVE CLOTHING!!!!  If the Republican party endorses a liberal candidate and tries to cram them down the throats of voters with strict conservative beliefs - they are the ones who will be responsible for keeping conservatives away from the polls.  Telling us that WE are responsible for the failure of a liberal Republican to win the presidential race is like telling a woman that she is responsible for the actions of a rapist.

I’ve made it clear that I will not be kidnapped.  I will not go along with evil men merely because they threaten my life.  Nor will I go with them because they threaten the lives of someone else.  I will not go along with them because I do not agree with what they are doing.  If they kill someone else or if they kill me because I refuse to cooperate - THEY ARE THE ONES WHO PULL THE TRIGGER - NOT ME.  In other words, any innocent blood shed is not by my hand but theirs.  In the same way, those who offer up a liberal, pro sodomy, pro abortion, pro amnesty for law breaking aliens, pro higher taxes and anti second amendment (or any combination of the above) candidate and say “Vote for them or else” are giving me the same option as those who would attempt to force me to acquiesce to their demand to accompany them at the point of a gun.  I simply will not be coerced into violating my principles.

To those who are running the supposed “conservative” party I say “Give me a REAL conservative or I’ll seek out my own.  And so will others who are also tired of voting against someone.  Give us a leader who will honor the Constitution and the foundations of our nation, give us someone to vote FOR, who represents our values from the heart - or YOU will be responsible for the continued downward spiral of the nation as we sink lower and lower into the moral abyss - one “lesser evil” at a time.

10.15.07

“People of the Gun”

Posted in Firearms, Freedom at 7:27 pm by

Here’s an interesting site.  Thanks, Hobie, for putting it up on your blog.  It was started by folks reacting to a quote about “people of the gun” who support the right to keep and bear arms. It’s pretty funny that something that was meant as an insult was embraced by those it was meant to demean. I like it. Goes along well with “christian” and “johnny reb” and other such “slights” that folks have born in the past - with pride. “The disciples were called “christians” first in Antioch” state the scriptures. So “people of the gun” is yet another insult that many are willing to embrace. Maybe I should send them a link to the Pistol Packing Preachers website…

09.25.07

Hoplophobia

Posted in Christian, Faith, Firearms, Freedom at 10:20 am by

Hoplophobia - An unreasoning fear of instruments (weapons). Hoplophobia is a term that was coined, if I recall correctly, by the late Jeff Cooper.  It is an excellent term and describes well those who fear instruments more than the hands that wield them.  The very heart and soul of the anti-weapon movement revolves around the idea that individuals are not responsible for their actions, rather it is the object that spurs the criminal to commit the act of violence.  This is simply idiocy.  It does not take into account the millions upon millions of owners of weapons who do NOT commit crimes of violence.  Such an attitude is akin to looking upon all men as potential rapists - because, after all, they’re equipped to do so.  Or considering all women to be potential prostitutes - because, after all, they are equipped to exercise that activity.  And that’s no to mention the slap in the face of the billions of honest poor upon the planet when we are told that high rates of criminality are due to poverty.  What about the billions of poor who do NOT commit crimes?  Or the rich who commit crimes?

Criminal activity does not stem from availability of weapons.  Nor does it stem from the presence or absence of the Y chromosome.  Nor does it stem from poverty - or lack thereof.  It stems from the “heart” of the criminal, from his or her way of thinking and manner of justifying his or her actions.

And yet, too many people fear the object, the implement, the instrument - rather than fearing the person who wields that instrument.  The person who is capable of utilizing a firearm to commit a crime is also capable of committing crimes via other means.  Many, many criminals have extensive “rap sheets” in which their criminal life is partially recorded.  I say partially because all that’s there is what they’ve been arrested for or convicted of - not every thing they’ve ever done.  And time after time you’ll see the same person guilty of utilizing anything from a broken bottle to a pilfered firearm to commit acts of violence.  Often the same person will be guilty of physical aggression with a wide variety of objects, from their own hands to a pool cue to a broken bottle to a baseball bat to a firearm.  So why are firearms singled out?  Because of their perceived ease of use.  And also too often due to the inclination of the people who vilify them to desire to use them themselves.   It’s amazing to see the hypocrisy of the anti-weapon campaigners.  Many of them have weapons themselves - and yet seek to deprive others of their lawful use.  Why?  Because of the evil that lays within their own hearts and their fear that others may have that same evil within.

We should not fear inanimate objects.  We should fear the latent evil that resides within a considerable portion of the population.   And our goal should not be to remove weapons but rather to remove the desire to commit violence against others.  And that can only come about by a change of mind.

Do not be conformed to this age, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may discern what is the good, pleasing, and perfect will of God Romans 12:2

« Previous entries